<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s for short loin?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidairey.com/whos-for-short-loin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidairey.com/whos-for-short-loin/</link>
	<description>David is a graphic designer passionate about brand identity. Here&#039;s his portfolio and a wonderful community of 100K+ designers subscribed to his blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:16:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/whos-for-short-loin/comment-page-1/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/whos-for-short-loin/#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to throw a vegetarian voice in the mix. I&#039;m not for short loin! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to throw a vegetarian voice in the mix. I&#8217;m not for short loin! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Nash</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/whos-for-short-loin/comment-page-1/#comment-1176</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 03:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/whos-for-short-loin/#comment-1176</guid>
		<description>Neat site very humorous. Personally I think all websites should have a healthy mix of XHTML/CSS and Flash. My biggest annoyance with 100% flash websites is the inability to use the &quot;go back&quot; button on my browser other than that there isn&#039;t much else that is worth any merit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat site very humorous. Personally I think all websites should have a healthy mix of XHTML/CSS and Flash. My biggest annoyance with 100% flash websites is the inability to use the &#8220;go back&#8221; button on my browser other than that there isn&#8217;t much else that is worth any merit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilker</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/whos-for-short-loin/comment-page-1/#comment-1166</link>
		<dc:creator>ilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/whos-for-short-loin/#comment-1166</guid>
		<description>&quot;What’s your take on 100% Flash-constructed websites?&quot;

One word: No!

Flash doesn&#039;t deliver information faster than HTML. It just makes the website more &quot;fancy&quot;. My $0.02!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What’s your take on 100% Flash-constructed websites?&#8221;</p>
<p>One word: No!</p>
<p>Flash doesn&#8217;t deliver information faster than HTML. It just makes the website more &#8220;fancy&#8221;. My $0.02!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/whos-for-short-loin/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/whos-for-short-loin/#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>Good point about having two options for users &lt;b&gt;Richard&lt;/b&gt;. That way people won&#039;t need a plugin to view your info. Do let me know when your project is up and running as I&#039;d like to see it.

That creaktif site is an interesting one. Quite original. What I don&#039;t like about it however, is that the text is very difficult to read and there&#039;s no obvious &#039;contact&#039; section.

A pet peeve of mine is a section for &#039;links&#039;. There are links all-over the site so what&#039;s different about linking to links?

The automatic sound got a little annoying when I moused-over the &#039;movies&#039; a few times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about having two options for users <b>Richard</b>. That way people won&#8217;t need a plugin to view your info. Do let me know when your project is up and running as I&#8217;d like to see it.</p>
<p>That creaktif site is an interesting one. Quite original. What I don&#8217;t like about it however, is that the text is very difficult to read and there&#8217;s no obvious &#8216;contact&#8217; section.</p>
<p>A pet peeve of mine is a section for &#8216;links&#8217;. There are links all-over the site so what&#8217;s different about linking to links?</p>
<p>The automatic sound got a little annoying when I moused-over the &#8216;movies&#8217; a few times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/whos-for-short-loin/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/whos-for-short-loin/#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in the process of building a fully Flash powered project right now. If you supply alternative HTML (I think both the object and embed tags support this) then spiders will index it just fine, and anyone without Flash installed can play with the XHTML version of your site.

Having stumbled across http://creaktif.com though recently, it makes me want to quit doing XHTML/CSS all together and get stuck in with where the content lies.

So please Adobe... think of a way to make Flash more accessible/indexable.

All the best, Richard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in the process of building a fully Flash powered project right now. If you supply alternative HTML (I think both the object and embed tags support this) then spiders will index it just fine, and anyone without Flash installed can play with the XHTML version of your site.</p>
<p>Having stumbled across <a href="http://creaktif.com" rel="nofollow">http://creaktif.com</a> though recently, it makes me want to quit doing XHTML/CSS all together and get stuck in with where the content lies.</p>
<p>So please Adobe&#8230; think of a way to make Flash more accessible/indexable.</p>
<p>All the best, Richard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.davidairey.com/whos-for-short-loin/feed/ ) in 0.20834 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 2:41 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 3:41 am UTC -->
