<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Chip Shop Awards 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/</link>
	<description>Graphic designer with a passion for logos. View my logo designer portfolio and read free logo design tips from the blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: miranon</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103805</link>
		<dc:creator>miranon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 12:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103805</guid>
		<description>Window cleaner is superb. Good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Window cleaner is superb. Good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103372</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103372</guid>
		<description>I click on this without reading the intro properly and was disappointed at not finding recommendations for good chip shops, but actually this was much better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I click on this without reading the intro properly and was disappointed at not finding recommendations for good chip shops, but actually this was much better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103312</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103312</guid>
		<description>Bryan,

Thanks for adding to the 'off topic' design conversation. I appreciate your thoughts too, and it's interesting to get your take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan,</p>
<p>Thanks for adding to the &#8216;off topic&#8217; design conversation. I appreciate your thoughts too, and it&#8217;s interesting to get your take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Hoyt</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103286</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Hoyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103286</guid>
		<description>David &#38; Jonathan,

I know this has gone slightly off-topic, so just quickly: while it's true that most people browse with resolutions greater than 1024x768, that's the screen resolution, not the actual canvas size. You still have to account for the (many) people who keep their sidebars open, or browse with un-maximized windows. But agreed, you're probably still OK with the size of screens these days.

I do like the look of this site.

Jennie, interesting comments. I have to admit I thought the ad was very clever at first. Then after reading up on Tourette's (which I knew little about), I discovered that it was a bit misleading, and was somewhat disappointed. Thanks for your view!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &amp; Jonathan,</p>
<p>I know this has gone slightly off-topic, so just quickly: while it&#8217;s true that most people browse with resolutions greater than 1024&#215;768, that&#8217;s the screen resolution, not the actual canvas size. You still have to account for the (many) people who keep their sidebars open, or browse with un-maximized windows. But agreed, you&#8217;re probably still OK with the size of screens these days.</p>
<p>I do like the look of this site.</p>
<p>Jennie, interesting comments. I have to admit I thought the ad was very clever at first. Then after reading up on Tourette&#8217;s (which I knew little about), I discovered that it was a bit misleading, and was somewhat disappointed. Thanks for your view!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103146</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103146</guid>
		<description>firebubble, Ed, Mark,

No worries at all.

Jonathan,

I agree. Options #1 and #2 are definitely more suitable, even if an increase in future image widths would be nice. I'll see what I prefer when I have more time on my hands (still working on my new office space and home move). Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>firebubble, Ed, Mark,</p>
<p>No worries at all.</p>
<p>Jonathan,</p>
<p>I agree. Options #1 and #2 are definitely more suitable, even if an increase in future image widths would be nice. I&#8217;ll see what I prefer when I have more time on my hands (still working on my new office space and home move). Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103101</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103101</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this David. I never knew the Chip Shop awards existed! Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this David. I never knew the Chip Shop awards existed! Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103047</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103047</guid>
		<description>The window cleaner and ebay ads are truly brilliant... Lol.. I guess sometimes it's not necessarily the ads with all the special effects that attracts attention... If you have a great concept even the simplest things like that win awards... Thank you so much for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The window cleaner and ebay ads are truly brilliant&#8230; Lol.. I guess sometimes it&#8217;s not necessarily the ads with all the special effects that attracts attention&#8230; If you have a great concept even the simplest things like that win awards&#8230; Thank you so much for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-102991</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-102991</guid>
		<description>I think there's probably a few ways you could proceed:

1. Keep the middle post column/div at 460px, and just adjust the width of the sidebars/inter-column whitespace to compensate, thereby bringing the edges of the sidebars &lt;strong&gt;outward&lt;/strong&gt; by 20px to align with the navbar, header and footer.
2. Keeping the width of the post column constant at 460px, and the sidebar width/margins identical, but reduce the overall width of the rest of the site, ie, bringing the navbar, header and footer &lt;strong&gt;inward&lt;/strong&gt; by 20px so that the navbar, header, footer edges align with the sidebar edges.
3. Resize the post column/div to 500px &#38; apply a CSS rule to centre all images inside the post divs, and create 500px width images going forward. Older posts would display the 460px images centred within the 500px column (although I don't know if having centred images in the midst of flush left article text would is ideal either).

I think your current line length of around 70 characters/12words is ideal from a readability perspective, so I would have thought that the first 2 solutions are easier and more elegant than the 3rd solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s probably a few ways you could proceed:</p>
<p>1. Keep the middle post column/div at 460px, and just adjust the width of the sidebars/inter-column whitespace to compensate, thereby bringing the edges of the sidebars <strong>outward</strong> by 20px to align with the navbar, header and footer.<br />
2. Keeping the width of the post column constant at 460px, and the sidebar width/margins identical, but reduce the overall width of the rest of the site, ie, bringing the navbar, header and footer <strong>inward</strong> by 20px so that the navbar, header, footer edges align with the sidebar edges.<br />
3. Resize the post column/div to 500px &amp; apply a CSS rule to centre all images inside the post divs, and create 500px width images going forward. Older posts would display the 460px images centred within the 500px column (although I don&#8217;t know if having centred images in the midst of flush left article text would is ideal either).</p>
<p>I think your current line length of around 70 characters/12words is ideal from a readability perspective, so I would have thought that the first 2 solutions are easier and more elegant than the 3rd solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firebubble - logo designer</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-102949</link>
		<dc:creator>firebubble - logo designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-102949</guid>
		<description>My favorite is definitely Jim the Window Cleaner, that made me smile.Good work by the design company Lake. Think I will go check out their website now. Thank you for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite is definitely Jim the Window Cleaner, that made me smile.Good work by the design company Lake. Think I will go check out their website now. Thank you for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-102946</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-102946</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for taking the time, Jonathan. That answers a few questions alright.

My favourite of your four screenshots is definitely the first - flush headings with white background. My only reservation is the image width change. All my pictures, YouTube videos etc. are configured to 460px width, so to display them on a width of 500 would look a bit out of place. Maybe it'd be for the best though. Do you reckon? Thanks again. Your help's much appreciated, and I'll have to get familiar with the FF Web Dev tools!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for taking the time, Jonathan. That answers a few questions alright.</p>
<p>My favourite of your four screenshots is definitely the first - flush headings with white background. My only reservation is the image width change. All my pictures, YouTube videos etc. are configured to 460px width, so to display them on a width of 500 would look a bit out of place. Maybe it&#8217;d be for the best though. Do you reckon? Thanks again. Your help&#8217;s much appreciated, and I&#8217;ll have to get familiar with the FF Web Dev tools!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.272 seconds -->
