<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Chip Shop Awards 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/</link>
	<description>David is a graphic designer passionate about brand identity. Here&#039;s his portfolio and a wonderful community of 15,000+ designers reading his blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:25:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: miranon</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103805</link>
		<dc:creator>miranon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 12:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103805</guid>
		<description>Window cleaner is superb. Good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Window cleaner is superb. Good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103372</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103372</guid>
		<description>I click on this without reading the intro properly and was disappointed at not finding recommendations for good chip shops, but actually this was much better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I click on this without reading the intro properly and was disappointed at not finding recommendations for good chip shops, but actually this was much better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103312</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103312</guid>
		<description>Bryan,

Thanks for adding to the &#039;off topic&#039; design conversation. I appreciate your thoughts too, and it&#039;s interesting to get your take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan,</p>
<p>Thanks for adding to the &#8216;off topic&#8217; design conversation. I appreciate your thoughts too, and it&#8217;s interesting to get your take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Hoyt</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103286</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Hoyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103286</guid>
		<description>David &amp; Jonathan,

I know this has gone slightly off-topic, so just quickly: while it&#039;s true that most people browse with resolutions greater than 1024x768, that&#039;s the screen resolution, not the actual canvas size. You still have to account for the (many) people who keep their sidebars open, or browse with un-maximized windows. But agreed, you&#039;re probably still OK with the size of screens these days.

I do like the look of this site.

Jennie, interesting comments. I have to admit I thought the ad was very clever at first. Then after reading up on Tourette&#039;s (which I knew little about), I discovered that it was a bit misleading, and was somewhat disappointed. Thanks for your view!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &amp; Jonathan,</p>
<p>I know this has gone slightly off-topic, so just quickly: while it&#8217;s true that most people browse with resolutions greater than 1024&#215;768, that&#8217;s the screen resolution, not the actual canvas size. You still have to account for the (many) people who keep their sidebars open, or browse with un-maximized windows. But agreed, you&#8217;re probably still OK with the size of screens these days.</p>
<p>I do like the look of this site.</p>
<p>Jennie, interesting comments. I have to admit I thought the ad was very clever at first. Then after reading up on Tourette&#8217;s (which I knew little about), I discovered that it was a bit misleading, and was somewhat disappointed. Thanks for your view!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103146</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103146</guid>
		<description>firebubble, Ed, Mark,

No worries at all.

Jonathan,

I agree. Options #1 and #2 are definitely more suitable, even if an increase in future image widths would be nice. I&#039;ll see what I prefer when I have more time on my hands (still working on my new office space and home move). Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>firebubble, Ed, Mark,</p>
<p>No worries at all.</p>
<p>Jonathan,</p>
<p>I agree. Options #1 and #2 are definitely more suitable, even if an increase in future image widths would be nice. I&#8217;ll see what I prefer when I have more time on my hands (still working on my new office space and home move). Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103101</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103101</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this David. I never knew the Chip Shop awards existed! Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this David. I never knew the Chip Shop awards existed! Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-103047</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-103047</guid>
		<description>The window cleaner and ebay ads are truly brilliant... Lol.. I guess sometimes it&#039;s not necessarily the ads with all the special effects that attracts attention... If you have a great concept even the simplest things like that win awards... Thank you so much for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The window cleaner and ebay ads are truly brilliant&#8230; Lol.. I guess sometimes it&#8217;s not necessarily the ads with all the special effects that attracts attention&#8230; If you have a great concept even the simplest things like that win awards&#8230; Thank you so much for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-102991</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-102991</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s probably a few ways you could proceed:

1. Keep the middle post column/div at 460px, and just adjust the width of the sidebars/inter-column whitespace to compensate, thereby bringing the edges of the sidebars &lt;strong&gt;outward&lt;/strong&gt; by 20px to align with the navbar, header and footer.
2. Keeping the width of the post column constant at 460px, and the sidebar width/margins identical, but reduce the overall width of the rest of the site, ie, bringing the navbar, header and footer &lt;strong&gt;inward&lt;/strong&gt; by 20px so that the navbar, header, footer edges align with the sidebar edges.
3. Resize the post column/div to 500px &amp; apply a CSS rule to centre all images inside the post divs, and create 500px width images going forward. Older posts would display the 460px images centred within the 500px column (although I don&#039;t know if having centred images in the midst of flush left article text would is ideal either).

I think your current line length of around 70 characters/12words is ideal from a readability perspective, so I would have thought that the first 2 solutions are easier and more elegant than the 3rd solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s probably a few ways you could proceed:</p>
<p>1. Keep the middle post column/div at 460px, and just adjust the width of the sidebars/inter-column whitespace to compensate, thereby bringing the edges of the sidebars <strong>outward</strong> by 20px to align with the navbar, header and footer.<br />
2. Keeping the width of the post column constant at 460px, and the sidebar width/margins identical, but reduce the overall width of the rest of the site, ie, bringing the navbar, header and footer <strong>inward</strong> by 20px so that the navbar, header, footer edges align with the sidebar edges.<br />
3. Resize the post column/div to 500px &amp; apply a CSS rule to centre all images inside the post divs, and create 500px width images going forward. Older posts would display the 460px images centred within the 500px column (although I don&#8217;t know if having centred images in the midst of flush left article text would is ideal either).</p>
<p>I think your current line length of around 70 characters/12words is ideal from a readability perspective, so I would have thought that the first 2 solutions are easier and more elegant than the 3rd solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firebubble - logo designer</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-102949</link>
		<dc:creator>firebubble - logo designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-102949</guid>
		<description>My favorite is definitely Jim the Window Cleaner, that made me smile.Good work by the design company Lake. Think I will go check out their website now. Thank you for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite is definitely Jim the Window Cleaner, that made me smile.Good work by the design company Lake. Think I will go check out their website now. Thank you for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/the-chip-shop-awards-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-102946</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/?p=618#comment-102946</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for taking the time, Jonathan. That answers a few questions alright.

My favourite of your four screenshots is definitely the first - flush headings with white background. My only reservation is the image width change. All my pictures, YouTube videos etc. are configured to 460px width, so to display them on a width of 500 would look a bit out of place. Maybe it&#039;d be for the best though. Do you reckon? Thanks again. Your help&#039;s much appreciated, and I&#039;ll have to get familiar with the FF Web Dev tools!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for taking the time, Jonathan. That answers a few questions alright.</p>
<p>My favourite of your four screenshots is definitely the first &#8211; flush headings with white background. My only reservation is the image width change. All my pictures, YouTube videos etc. are configured to 460px width, so to display them on a width of 500 would look a bit out of place. Maybe it&#8217;d be for the best though. Do you reckon? Thanks again. Your help&#8217;s much appreciated, and I&#8217;ll have to get familiar with the FF Web Dev tools!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.231 seconds -->
