<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is your logo design phallic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidairey.com/is-your-logo-design-phallic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidairey.com/is-your-logo-design-phallic/</link>
	<description>David is a graphic designer passionate about brand identity. Here&#039;s his portfolio and a wonderful community of 15,000+ designers reading his blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:25:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stu</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/is-your-logo-design-phallic/comment-page-2/#comment-127949</link>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/is-your-logo-design-phallic/#comment-127949</guid>
		<description>These are very good especially the brazillian. but has anyone seen the randywood.co.uk website?  the name is one thing but then take a double look at the name. boy that has to be the best disguised penis yet. and it&#039;s a genuine clothing brand !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are very good especially the brazillian. but has anyone seen the randywood.co.uk website?  the name is one thing but then take a double look at the name. boy that has to be the best disguised penis yet. and it&#8217;s a genuine clothing brand !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/is-your-logo-design-phallic/comment-page-2/#comment-127164</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/is-your-logo-design-phallic/#comment-127164</guid>
		<description>Perhaps to appeal to the masculine side of the audience, Paul? You&#039;re not wrong. Used to love watching American Football when I was a kid, but can&#039;t get into it now. Too long, too much standing around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps to appeal to the masculine side of the audience, Paul? You&#8217;re not wrong. Used to love watching American Football when I was a kid, but can&#8217;t get into it now. Too long, too much standing around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul J</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/is-your-logo-design-phallic/comment-page-2/#comment-127041</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/is-your-logo-design-phallic/#comment-127041</guid>
		<description>ah gotta love the NFL. their new (standardized) logo for the superbowl certainly could be considered phallic.

http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/news/story?id=4886793</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah gotta love the NFL. their new (standardized) logo for the superbowl certainly could be considered phallic.</p>
<p><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/news/story?id=4886793" rel="nofollow">http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/news/story?id=4886793</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/is-your-logo-design-phallic/comment-page-2/#comment-126555</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/is-your-logo-design-phallic/#comment-126555</guid>
		<description>Hi Caroline, I think any logo showing a lighthouse could be considered phallic, depending on the mind of the onlooker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Caroline, I think any logo showing a lighthouse could be considered phallic, depending on the mind of the onlooker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/is-your-logo-design-phallic/comment-page-2/#comment-126553</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/is-your-logo-design-phallic/#comment-126553</guid>
		<description>Sorry I guess I forgot the link. Again is it just me, or would this qualify?

http://www.seeklogo.com/images/C/Castle_Rock_Entertainment-logo-068635484D-seeklogo.com.gif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I guess I forgot the link. Again is it just me, or would this qualify?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seeklogo.com/images/C/Castle_Rock_Entertainment-logo-068635484D-seeklogo.com.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.seeklogo.com/images/C/Castle_Rock_Entertainment-logo-068635484D-seeklogo.com.gif</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasonized</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/is-your-logo-design-phallic/comment-page-2/#comment-126538</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonized</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/is-your-logo-design-phallic/#comment-126538</guid>
		<description>Arlington Pediatric Center - If I was a kid, i&#039;d sue them.

Nice collection david.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arlington Pediatric Center &#8211; If I was a kid, i&#8217;d sue them.</p>
<p>Nice collection david.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/is-your-logo-design-phallic/comment-page-2/#comment-125251</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/is-your-logo-design-phallic/#comment-125251</guid>
		<description>What a laugh.... is it just me, or does this qualify?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a laugh&#8230;. is it just me, or does this qualify?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Holzer</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/is-your-logo-design-phallic/comment-page-2/#comment-124339</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Holzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/is-your-logo-design-phallic/#comment-124339</guid>
		<description>Another phallic logo. Scroll down.
http://harrisburg.craigslist.org/mat/1437962007.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another phallic logo. Scroll down.<br />
<a href="http://harrisburg.craigslist.org/mat/1437962007.html" rel="nofollow">http://harrisburg.craigslist.org/mat/1437962007.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niki</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/is-your-logo-design-phallic/comment-page-2/#comment-124060</link>
		<dc:creator>Niki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/is-your-logo-design-phallic/#comment-124060</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this laugh. I am working with a group now on a logo and I&#039;m quite embarrassed by what they &quot;like.&quot; I had to escape to the Internet to see if it was just me or them. it&#039;s them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this laugh. I am working with a group now on a logo and I&#8217;m quite embarrassed by what they &#8220;like.&#8221; I had to escape to the Internet to see if it was just me or them. it&#8217;s them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/is-your-logo-design-phallic/comment-page-2/#comment-121668</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/blog/is-your-logo-design-phallic/#comment-121668</guid>
		<description>hilarious!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hilarious!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.217 seconds -->
