<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Analytics: referring sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/</link>
	<description>Graphic designer with a passion for logos. View my logo designer portfolio and read free logo design tips from the blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-105035</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-105035</guid>
		<description>Hi Shaina,

Sorry to learn of your unwanted visitor. I've no idea how it happened, but where online content is concerned, you should always expect unwanted visitors. I learnt the hard way when my domain name was stolen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shaina,</p>
<p>Sorry to learn of your unwanted visitor. I&#8217;ve no idea how it happened, but where online content is concerned, you should always expect unwanted visitors. I learnt the hard way when my domain name was stolen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaina</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-104914</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-104914</guid>
		<description>I use Google analytics. and I have more than one blog. I just created one where I did not want people from the first to find me.
When I looked at analytics this morning there was a referral site,  linking to the main person I did not want to find me. 

Is there anyway she COULD have found me with my profile being disabled?

or does her address show up If I jumped from her page to mine using my bookmarks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Google analytics. and I have more than one blog. I just created one where I did not want people from the first to find me.<br />
When I looked at analytics this morning there was a referral site,  linking to the main person I did not want to find me. </p>
<p>Is there anyway she COULD have found me with my profile being disabled?</p>
<p>or does her address show up If I jumped from her page to mine using my bookmarks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey :: Graphic Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-28188</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey :: Graphic Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 16:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-28188</guid>
		<description>Hi Dale,

Sorry it's taken a while to respond. I'm really no expert on Newsgator. In fact I'm hardly familiar with it at all, so I can't give the answer you're looking for. I think that anyone you subscribe to will be very glad of your attention, but I can appreciate you wanting to give more (hits).

Swiss Mouse,

Interesting to know. Thanks for commenting.

Dean,

I agree entirely how the info is great for shaping future posts, and you also know that it's worthwhile advertising, or contributing, in forum threads, due to the higher quality of traffic gained. Thanks for the stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dale,</p>
<p>Sorry it&#8217;s taken a while to respond. I&#8217;m really no expert on Newsgator. In fact I&#8217;m hardly familiar with it at all, so I can&#8217;t give the answer you&#8217;re looking for. I think that anyone you subscribe to will be very glad of your attention, but I can appreciate you wanting to give more (hits).</p>
<p>Swiss Mouse,</p>
<p>Interesting to know. Thanks for commenting.</p>
<p>Dean,</p>
<p>I agree entirely how the info is great for shaping future posts, and you also know that it&#8217;s worthwhile advertising, or contributing, in forum threads, due to the higher quality of traffic gained. Thanks for the stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean @ Technical Itch</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-25569</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean @ Technical Itch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-25569</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip.  I haven't tried analyzing traffic by source much before.  StumbleUpon is my top referrer too with 1.80 pages/visit and 1:46 average time on site.  Referrals from problogger were 1:58 pages/visit and 3:41 average time on site, indicating higher quality traffic.  

I've found some of the best referrals in terms of time spent on site are from forums, anything from 8 to 13 minutes on site.

This information will be very useful in helping to shape future posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip.  I haven&#8217;t tried analyzing traffic by source much before.  StumbleUpon is my top referrer too with 1.80 pages/visit and 1:46 average time on site.  Referrals from problogger were 1:58 pages/visit and 3:41 average time on site, indicating higher quality traffic.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found some of the best referrals in terms of time spent on site are from forums, anything from 8 to 13 minutes on site.</p>
<p>This information will be very useful in helping to shape future posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swiss_Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-25399</link>
		<dc:creator>Swiss_Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-25399</guid>
		<description>The Swiss_Mouse just posted a comparison of Page view and Unique visitors on Cheddarblog.

Interestingly, Google and Statcounter were "close" but the numbers for 1and1 Webstats were ....well...very high. Too high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Swiss_Mouse just posted a comparison of Page view and Unique visitors on Cheddarblog.</p>
<p>Interestingly, Google and Statcounter were &#8220;close&#8221; but the numbers for 1and1 Webstats were &#8230;.well&#8230;very high. Too high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-25325</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-25325</guid>
		<description>So there would be no referrer in this case…. 

Hmmm… I guess I had imagined that companies like Newsgator pulled a copy of your feed then served it to requestors … meaning, in effect, many people could read the articles off Newsgator's single access to your site. I thought that because I sometimes see delays between the appearance of an article on a site and the available of that article via a reader. Maybe I'm over-analyzing, but I was actually trying to figure out if I'm short-changing anyone of hit counts (or of anything else) by reading their articles via Newsgator rather than going directly to their sites. Sounds like you don't think I am…. 

Or is this a different subject entirely?

Thanks,

Dale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So there would be no referrer in this case…. </p>
<p>Hmmm… I guess I had imagined that companies like Newsgator pulled a copy of your feed then served it to requestors … meaning, in effect, many people could read the articles off Newsgator&#8217;s single access to your site. I thought that because I sometimes see delays between the appearance of an article on a site and the available of that article via a reader. Maybe I&#8217;m over-analyzing, but I was actually trying to figure out if I&#8217;m short-changing anyone of hit counts (or of anything else) by reading their articles via Newsgator rather than going directly to their sites. Sounds like you don&#8217;t think I am…. </p>
<p>Or is this a different subject entirely?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Dale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey :: Graphic Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-25301</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey :: Graphic Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-25301</guid>
		<description>Hi Dale,

You know, I think that the Google stats record the visit from your feed reader, only to access the article. You could simply mark all your reader posts as 'read' and close your browser, but since your reader pulled the info off my site it counts as a hit / visit (not sure which).

If you think I can help with another question just fire away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dale,</p>
<p>You know, I think that the Google stats record the visit from your feed reader, only to access the article. You could simply mark all your reader posts as &#8216;read&#8217; and close your browser, but since your reader pulled the info off my site it counts as a hit / visit (not sure which).</p>
<p>If you think I can help with another question just fire away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-25288</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-25288</guid>
		<description>Hi, David. Excellent article, thanks for the great information as usual.

A question for you....

When I read articles from your site using an RSS reader like Newsgator and never actually come to the site, does that show up somewhere in the statistics Google Analytics provides? 

Depending on your answer, I may have a second question....

Thanks!

Dale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, David. Excellent article, thanks for the great information as usual.</p>
<p>A question for you&#8230;.</p>
<p>When I read articles from your site using an RSS reader like Newsgator and never actually come to the site, does that show up somewhere in the statistics Google Analytics provides? </p>
<p>Depending on your answer, I may have a second question&#8230;.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Dale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey :: Graphic Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-24652</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey :: Graphic Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-24652</guid>
		<description>Palm Coast,

Of course, you make a great point, that Google uses the data to rank your site accordingly. I think the point of using your Analytics is to see what traffic sources are of most value. Then you can maximise those sources with partnerships / affiliations etc. At least that's one simple way of using the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palm Coast,</p>
<p>Of course, you make a great point, that Google uses the data to rank your site accordingly. I think the point of using your Analytics is to see what traffic sources are of most value. Then you can maximise those sources with partnerships / affiliations etc. At least that&#8217;s one simple way of using the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palm Coast</title>
		<link>http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-24529</link>
		<dc:creator>Palm Coast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 02:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidairey.com/google-analytics-referring-sites/#comment-24529</guid>
		<description>Analytics is nice for the average user, but if you're doing any real marketing within Google then I really don't see why anyone would use it, especially if you're trying to rank for a term in Google. Another thing that baffles me is people using it for sites they advertise in AdWords, just doesn't make any sense. You're giving out info to Google, and if your site(s) are something special then believe me, Google uses that data ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analytics is nice for the average user, but if you&#8217;re doing any real marketing within Google then I really don&#8217;t see why anyone would use it, especially if you&#8217;re trying to rank for a term in Google. Another thing that baffles me is people using it for sites they advertise in AdWords, just doesn&#8217;t make any sense. You&#8217;re giving out info to Google, and if your site(s) are something special then believe me, Google uses that data ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.461 seconds -->
