Many of you showed your dislike of the London 2012 logo, leaving a host of comments in the thread of yesterday’s post.
I woke to more news about the negative impressions, so thought I’d follow-up with a few thoughts from around the Internet.
The BBC is showing alternative logos by viewers. Not great, but I’ve picked out a few:
Chris Autry, managing director of ad agency Fhlame, noticed a resemblance to the children’s programme Tiswas of the 70s and 80s.
“Putting London in lower case and in cartoon writing is a “disgrace” to the city, and there’s an imbalance in having the word London and the Olympic rings both in the top half of the logo. The word London is in an inelegant font, which devalues London as a city. It looks like a child’s writing.”
The lower right logo (above) was the original London Olympic logo during the pitch. Much better, although the legibility could be improved.
The design community continue to voice opinions — here are a few recent online articles:
Chase Jarvis talks about the shocking design spectrum.
The community at Creative Bits aren’t particularly in favour.
Aaron at miLienzo attempts to shed some positives on the logo.
Where’s the sausage says it’s like your dad disco dancing.
Duncan Borrowman reckons it looks like a 1980s art attack.
Reaction [beta] remind us that the client is just as responsible as the agency.
Elbowruminations throw Miami Vice and WHAM! into the mix.
Seth Godin reckons it’s just a jaggy picture.
I could go on, but I won’t.